SAST vs DAST: What’s The Difference?

In today’s digital landscape, where software vulnerabilities pose significant risks to organizations, application security testing plays a crucial role in ensuring robust and secure software systems. Two popular approaches to application security testing are Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). While both methodologies aim to identify vulnerabilities, they differ in their testing techniques, timing, and the types of vulnerabilities they detect. In this article, we will explore the differences between SAST and DAST and discuss when and how to use each approach effectively.

What is DAST?

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) is a methodology used to test the security of an application by simulating real-world attacks and interacting with the application in a running state. DAST tools analyze the application’s behavior and responses to identify potential vulnerabilities and security weaknesses. It focuses on vulnerabilities that can be exploited during runtime, such as injection attacks, cross-site scripting (XSS), and insecure configurations.

When to use DAST?

DAST is typically used when the application is in a fully functional state and ready for testing. It is beneficial during the later stages of the development process, such as pre-production or post-deployment. DAST provides a realistic assessment of an application’s security posture by evaluating how it responds to actual attack scenarios. It helps identify vulnerabilities that can only be discovered in the running application and ensures the application’s resilience against real-world threats.

Benefits of using DAST

• Realistic assessment: DAST provides a practical view of an application’s security by simulating real-world attacks. It helps identify vulnerabilities that can be exploited during runtime, reflecting the actual risks faced by the application in a live environment.
• Comprehensive coverage: DAST tests the entire application, including all its components and external interfaces. It covers different layers, such as the presentation layer, business logic layer, and data layer, ensuring a holistic assessment of security vulnerabilities.
• Simplicity and ease of use: DAST tools are relatively easy to set up and use. They require minimal configuration and do not require access to the application’s source code. This makes DAST accessible to security testers who may not have in-depth knowledge of the application’s codebase.
• Revealing vulnerabilities missed by other approaches: DAST can uncover vulnerabilities that may be missed by other testing methodologies, such as code-level vulnerabilities detected by Static Application Security Testing (SAST). It focuses on runtime vulnerabilities that are dependent on the specific execution context of the application.

What is SAST?

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a methodology used to test the security of an application by analyzing its source code or compiled code without executing the application. SAST tools scan the codebase to identify potential security vulnerabilities, coding errors, and security flaws. It examines the code structure, logic, and data flows to detect vulnerabilities that may exist in the application’s code.

When to use SAST?

SAST is most effective when used early in the development process, during the coding and code review stages. It helps identify code-level vulnerabilities and ensures that secure coding practices are followed from the outset. SAST can be integrated into the development process and seamlessly incorporated into the Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipeline.

Benefits of using SAST

• Early vulnerability detection: By analyzing the source code or compiled code, SAST can identify vulnerabilities at an early stage of the development process. This allows developers to address security issues before they become more complex and expensive to fix.
• Code-level vulnerability identification: SAST specializes in detecting code-level vulnerabilities, such as insecure coding practices, input validation issues, and insecure use of APIs. It helps ensure that the application’s code follows secure programming guidelines and best practices.
• Coverage for various programming languages: SAST supports a wide range of programming languages, making it applicable to diverse software projects. It can analyze code written in languages like Java, C/C++, .NET, Python, and more, providing security coverage across different technology stacks.
• Integration with development process: SAST can be seamlessly integrated into the development process, facilitating regular and automated code analysis. It can be integrated into code repositories, build systems, and code review tools, ensuring security is considered throughout the development lifecycle.

Key Differences between SAST and DAST

Conclusion

In the real of application security testing, understanding the differences between SAST and DAST is crucial for organizations to make informed decisions about their testing strategies.

Learn more about our Security Testing offerings at Testrig. We provide thorough security analysis supported by comprehensive reports and dashboards, accompanied by effective remedial measures for any issues identified. With our extensive expertise in Security Testing, we specialize in assessing the security of various applications, including web applications, mobile applications, software products, and web services. Our services cover both on-premise and cloud-based environments, ensuring comprehensive security assessment regardless of the infrastructure.

Explore our Security Testing Services to safeguard your applications and protect your valuable data.